<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Gemal&apos;s Psyched Blog - Comments on IFRAME without src attribute on HTTPS in Internet Explorer</title>
		<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/index.html</link>
		<description>This took me quite some time to debug. Once again it made me realize why I hate hate hate Internet Explorer. If you have a webpage on a HTTPS server with the following iframe code where you leave the src...</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:58:17 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:25:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.17</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		
		
			<item>
				<title>By Chadom</title>
				<description>It could be interesting to test with src=&quot;about:blank&quot;. Did you ?</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be interesting to test with src="about:blank". Did you ?</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment1?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment1</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:49:02 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Chadom</name>
					<email>qsdqsd.news@laposte.net</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Henrik Gemal</title>
				<description>I tested with bothsrc=&quot;about:blank&quot; and src=&quot;&quot;but it didn&apos;t work</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tested with both<br />
src="about:blank" and src=""<br />
but it didn't work</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment2?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment2</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:55:09 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Henrik Gemal</name>
					<email>spam@gemal.dk</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By minghong</title>
				<description>What about &quot;./&quot;? Just let it nests recursively. It will only nest for 3-4 levels. Sounds better than a dummy page. :-P</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about "./"? Just let it nests recursively. It will only nest for 3-4 levels. Sounds better than a dummy page. :-P</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment3?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment3</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:29:04 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>minghong</name>
					<email>minghong@gmail.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Mark Carson</title>
				<description>According to my old but serviceable O&apos;Reilly book (&quot;Dynamic HTML&quot;) the src attribute is indeed optional but it also states that a Javascript protocol and pseudo-URL can be specified. I wondering if something like: src=&quot;javascript: ;&quot;might work. I haven&apos;t tried it but it might be yet another workaround for that crappy, non-standards compliant browser.Since I&apos;ve had to program web-apps for IE for years (my customer&apos;s deployed browser) I have always made a &quot;blank.html&quot; file for each folder. More folder cruft IMHO.</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to my old but serviceable O'Reilly book ("Dynamic HTML") the src attribute is indeed optional but it also states that a Javascript protocol and pseudo-URL can be specified. I wondering if something like: </p>

<p>src="javascript: ;"</p>

<p>might work. I haven't tried it but it might be yet another workaround for that crappy, non-standards compliant browser.</p>

<p>Since I've had to program web-apps for IE for years (my customer's deployed browser) I have always made a "blank.html" file for each folder. More folder cruft IMHO.</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment4?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment4</guid>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 02:37:37 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Mark Carson</name>
					<email>Mark@MarkCarson.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Roger Hsu</title>
				<description>Thanks, it really works for me.Even better is, I realize I don&apos;t need to create a real &quot;blank.html&quot; file and it still works!My code:        elmIfr = document.createElement(&quot;IFRAME&quot;);	elmIfr.src = &quot;blank.html&quot;;        document.body.appendChild(elmIfr);</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, it really works for me.<br />
Even better is, I realize I don't need to create a real "blank.html" file and it still works!<br />
My code:<br />
        elmIfr = document.createElement("IFRAME");	elmIfr.src = "blank.html";<br />
        document.body.appendChild(elmIfr);</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment5?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment5</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 17:42:08 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Roger Hsu</name>
					<email>cchsu07@gmail.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By kevin</title>
				<description>I have this problem. However, the known resolutions do not fix mine. I do not use IFRAME. I do not use hard coded http urls, I only use relative paths for image loading etc. So, what else could be causing this darn message???? Also, it doesnt appear on Win2k with IE6 SP1, but does on Win2003 and XP with IE6 SP2</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have this problem. However, the known resolutions do not fix mine. I do not use IFRAME. I do not use hard coded http urls, I only use relative paths for image loading etc. So, what else could be causing this darn message???? Also, it doesnt appear on Win2k with IE6 SP1, but does on Win2003 and XP with IE6 SP2</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment6?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment6</guid>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 21:31:40 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>kevin</name>
					<email>balke03@ca.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By ulf</title>
				<description>Thank you very much for the workaround. It works for Internet Explorer Version 6. With IE 5.5 the src attribute is not needed. Declaring a non-existing page leads to an abnormal end of this browser. It shortly shows the above pop-up beforehand. I faked my iframe to be filled from index.html. Wonder what we need for IE 5.0, IE 4 etc. A pink Tamagotchi in the task bar?</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for the workaround. It works for Internet Explorer Version 6. With IE 5.5 the src attribute is not needed. Declaring a non-existing page leads to an abnormal end of this browser. It shortly shows the above pop-up beforehand. I faked my iframe to be filled from index.html. Wonder what we need for IE 5.0, IE 4 etc. A pink Tamagotchi in the task bar?</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment7?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment7</guid>
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:07:39 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>ulf</name>
					<email>ulf_l@gmx.de</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Michael</title>
				<description>I put a blank.html to use in the code where an iFrame helps construct a dropdown menu for my site. Two problems occur;1) The history (IE) gets corrupted so that every page calls to the blank.html file.2) The images do not appear.Any help would be greatly appreciated.</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I put a blank.html to use in the code where an iFrame helps construct a dropdown menu for my site. Two problems occur;</p>

<p>1) The history (IE) gets corrupted so that every page calls to the blank.html file.</p>

<p>2) The images do not appear.</p>

<p>Any help would be greatly appreciated.</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment8?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment8</guid>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:20:29 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Michael</name>
					<email>michaelc@uanet.org</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Adam Edell</title>
				<description>I&apos;m so glad others have been going nuts over this! I&apos;ve got an https page which has an IFRAME with a src set to a relative path to an aspx page. That works fine. Setting src to &quot;javascript:&quot; as suggested in some posts plain did NOT work. Got the mixed security content dialog anywyay. However, my elusive problem is when I change the location of the IFRAME using javascript, i get the warning when new content comes into the IFRAME... All my images have been adjusted to use https... There is NO content whatsoever that seems missing in any way... I&apos;m using an AJAX callback function to change the location of the IFRAME, and I&apos;ll be looking into that, but other than that I&apos;m stumped!I wish there was some way to debug the exact content that the warning is referring to!!</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm so glad others have been going nuts over this! I've got an https page which has an IFRAME with a src set to a relative path to an aspx page. That works fine. Setting src to "javascript:" as suggested in some posts plain did NOT work. Got the mixed security content dialog anywyay. However, my elusive problem is when I change the location of the IFRAME using javascript, i get the warning when new content comes into the IFRAME... All my images have been adjusted to use https... There is NO content whatsoever that seems missing in any way... I'm using an AJAX callback function to change the location of the IFRAME, and I'll be looking into that, but other than that I'm stumped!</p>

<p>I wish there was some way to debug the exact content that the warning is referring to!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment9?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment9</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 20:33:07 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Adam Edell</name>
					<email>aedell@spark.net</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By albert</title>
				<description>hi guys, i dont quite understand the solution here the problem is that my https:// doesnt go inside the frame it goes to another page but works fine..i wanted it to be inside the frame where it had a scrolls.thank you so much i appreciate it</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi guys, i dont quite understand the solution here the problem is that my https:// doesnt go inside the frame it goes to another page but works fine..i wanted it to be inside the frame where it had a scrolls.</p>

<p>thank you so much i appreciate it</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment10?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment10</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 06:37:29 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>albert</name>
					<email>xcellencio@yahoo.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Greg Camp</title>
				<description>Thanks, I spent hours trying to fix this problem.</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I spent hours trying to fix this problem.</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment11?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment11</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 00:38:58 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Greg Camp</name>
					<email>greg@cybernamixqld.com.au</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Jeff Saunders</title>
				<description>I had the same problem.  My solution was src=&quot;javascript:void(0)&quot;.  Works with IE and Firefox...didn&apos;t test it further.</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same problem.  My solution was src="javascript:void(0)".  Works with IE and Firefox...didn't test it further.</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment12?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment12</guid>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 06:49:31 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Jeff Saunders</name>
					<email>jeffsaunders@gmail.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Eric Fedok</title>
				<description>Thanks much!  Saved me a lot of time and gave me another reason to hate Microsoft</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks much!  Saved me a lot of time and gave me another reason to hate Microsoft</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment13?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment13</guid>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 19:52:05 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Eric Fedok</name>
					<email>nobody@yahoo.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By stpasha</title>
				<description>In IE7 this could be fixed by src=&quot;https://about:blank&quot;, although this solution crashes IE6 :)Also, src=&quot;javascript:void(0)&quot; doesn&apos;t work (at least in IE6) - still the same security warning</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In IE7 this could be fixed by src="<a href="https://about:blank" rel="nofollow">https://about:blank",</a> although this solution crashes IE6 :)</p>

<p>Also, src="javascript:void(0)" doesn't work (at least in IE6) - still the same security warning</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment14?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment14</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 23:26:39 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>stpasha</name>
					<email>stpasha@gmail.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Balaji Krishnamurthy</title>
				<description>In IE6 and FireFox, this could be fixed by src=&quot;spacer.gif&quot; and put spacer.gif at your root. Once this image is cached at the browser and browser would not request this image and it should work irrespective of protocol.</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In IE6 and FireFox, this could be fixed by src="spacer.gif" and put spacer.gif at your root. Once this image is cached at the browser and browser would not request this image and it should work irrespective of protocol.<br />
</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment15?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment15</guid>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:52:15 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Balaji Krishnamurthy</name>
					<email>krish.balaji@gmail.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Krishnanath</title>
				<description>As said by Michael, if we use dummy url for the src attribute like , then the IE history is corrupted and if you have more than one iframes history is a mess.. Could someone help????</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As said by Michael, if we use dummy url for the src attribute like , then the IE history is corrupted and if you have more than one iframes history is a mess.. Could someone help????</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment16?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment16</guid>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:30:04 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Krishnanath</name>
					<email>krishnanathv@gmail.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Krishnanath</title>
				<description>src=&quot;javascript:void(0)&quot;  is working for me in IE 6 SP2</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>src="javascript:void(0)"  is working for me in IE 6 SP2</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment17?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment17</guid>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:33:13 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Krishnanath</name>
					<email>krishnanathv@gmail.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Madhukar</title>
				<description>I am using iframe as a Divshim. So I need an empty iframe on which div is to be inserted. src=&quot;javascript: ;&quot; did nopt work for me. I used src=&quot;blank.html&quot; this does work but I don&apos;t want create an blank file. So I have pointed the src to a image file which is already there in the product, src=&quot;image.jpg&quot; . This works good. as I don&apos;t have create a new file.</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using iframe as a Divshim. So I need an empty iframe on which div is to be inserted. src="javascript: ;" did nopt work for me. I used src="blank.html" this does work but I don't want create an blank file. So I have pointed the src to a image file which is already there in the product, src="image.jpg" . This works good. as I don't have create a new file.</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment18?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment18</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 06:37:59 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Madhukar</name>
					<email>connectmadhukar@gmail.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By MIB</title>
				<description>Try this: src=&quot;javascript:&apos;&apos;&quot; is working in IE6 SP2</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try this: src="javascript:''" is working in IE6 SP2</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment19?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment19</guid>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:43:50 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>MIB</name>
					<email>michael2.bohn@gmx.de</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By xurizaemon</title>
				<description>javascript:false works for me (using as a div shim also) but i ended up using a blank html file (otherwise it says &apos;false&apos;)void(0) - this function doesn&apos;t require arguments, yet so often i see it with a parameter of 0 ... can someone tell why this is?what are you doing to the poor 0??</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>javascript:false works for me (using as a div shim also) but i ended up using a blank html file (otherwise it says 'false')</p>

<p>void(0) - this function doesn't require arguments, yet so often i see it with a parameter of 0 ... can someone tell why this is?</p>

<p>what are you doing to the poor 0??</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment20?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment20</guid>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 05:54:45 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>xurizaemon</name>
					<email>xurizaemon@gmail.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By stevef</title>
				<description>Ah lovely ie7.0 breaks the suggested fix, it gives me the warning with src=&apos;javascript:false;&apos;grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. Why cant it just be consitent</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah lovely ie7.0 breaks the suggested fix, it gives me the warning with src='javascript:false;'<br />
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. Why cant it just be consitent</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment21?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment21</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:02:57 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>stevef</name>
					<email>sjf_100@hotmail.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Robin Bygrave</title>
				<description>With my IE6 SP2 on WindowsXP the javascript colon single quote single quote works for me too. &quot;javascript:&apos;&apos;&quot;If this works in IE7 then perhaps this is a good solution?</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With my IE6 SP2 on WindowsXP the javascript colon single quote single quote works for me too. "javascript:''"</p>

<p>If this works in IE7 then perhaps this is a good solution?</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment22?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment22</guid>
				<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 07:30:50 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Robin Bygrave</name>
					<email>rbygrave@yahoo.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Kwooda</title>
				<description>void() accepts any expression and simply does not return a result.  0, by itself, is a valid expression, though it could be anything - even nothing.  void(&apos;hey!&apos;), void(null), void(), etc.Anyway, I was going to suggest the javascript:&apos;&apos; solution, but it looks like a couple people already have.</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>void() accepts any expression and simply does not return a result.  0, by itself, is a valid expression, though it could be anything - even nothing.  void('hey!'), void(null), void(), etc.</p>

<p>Anyway, I was going to suggest the javascript:'' solution, but it looks like a couple people already have.</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment23?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment23</guid>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:19:53 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Kwooda</name>
					<email>kwooda@netzero.net</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Zigmond</title>
				<description>I found the best solution to be:src = &quot;.&quot;This way you always get a page - either the directory of the folder or the &quot;not authorized&quot; page from the server.They you just override the document.body with your own..</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the best solution to be:<br />
src = "."</p>

<p>This way you always get a page - either the directory of the folder or the "not authorized" page from the server.<br />
They you just override the document.body with your own..<br />
</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment24?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment24</guid>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 17:47:36 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Zigmond</name>
					<email>somewhere@overtherainbow.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Laurens Holst</title>
				<description>Funny that I run in to this when searching for “iframe src attribute firefox 3 crash”… :).Funny because in Firefox 3, when you dynamically set the ‘src’ attribute on an XHTML iframe element (parsed as XML), the browser crashes. Fixed in Firefox 3.5, but hey,“Once again it made me realize why I hate hate hate Mozilla Firefox.”(not really! but it is a bit of the pot calling the kettle black :))</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny that I run in to this when searching for “iframe src attribute firefox 3 crash”… :).</p>

<p>Funny because in Firefox 3, when you dynamically set the ‘src’ attribute on an XHTML iframe element (parsed as XML), the browser crashes. Fixed in Firefox 3.5, but hey,</p>

<p>“Once again it made me realize why I hate hate hate Mozilla Firefox.”</p>

<p>(not really! but it is a bit of the pot calling the kettle black :))</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment25?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment25</guid>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:57:54 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Laurens Holst</name>
					<email>laurens.nospam@grauw.nl</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By KJ</title>
				<description>Many thanks to Gemel and Roger Hsu.  Between your two posts I was able to figure out how to get rid of that most annoying security pop up!</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks to Gemel and Roger Hsu.  Between your two posts I was able to figure out how to get rid of that most annoying security pop up!</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment26?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2005/01/27/iframe_without_src_attribute_on_https_in_internet_explorer/#comment26</guid>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:29:07 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>KJ</name>
					<email>ken@evergreenits.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>

